Transferring A Business Property Into Your SMSF

The procedure of transferring property between SMSFs may be somewhat complicated. This tutorial will walk you through the process of transferring an existing commercial property into a self-managed super fund (SMSF). In addition, we will offer some advice to make the process run as smoothly as possible.

Continue reading in order to obtain all of the information you want, regardless of whether you intend to transfer a commercial property into your own SMSF or are considering transferring one into the SMSF of another person.

Let's get started!

How To Transfer A Business Property Into Your SMSF

Employers with a self-managed super fund (SMSF) and are searching for a way to safeguard their company's assets may choose to investigate the possibility of moving their business property into their SMSF.

In the event that your firm is subject to legal action or declares bankruptcy, it is a smart idea to protect your assets by putting business property into your self-managed super fund (SMSF).

When it comes to transferring business real property (land and buildings that are used exclusively for the operation of the business) into their SMSFs, members of SMSFs have a number of different alternatives available to them. These options include:

In-species transfer

A transfer of ownership of a property from one entity to another in the setting of a commercial property is referred to as an in-species transfer. This is because the ownership of the property is being transferred within the same species. This takes place when the property in question is not turned into cash at any point during the process.

When you transfer property within the same species, the asset's value is counted as a contribution to your SMSF and is subject to the capital gains tax requirements as well as the contribution cap.

Cashing in your SMSF

You are allowed to use the cash that is available in your SMSF to complete a standard cash transaction, such as the purchase of your commercial property at the value that is prevailing in the market.

Prior to this being permitted, the property in question must first be evaluated by a third party that is both impartial and competent. SMSFs that do not have sufficient capital to achieve this can consider utilising their non-concessional contributions cap to settle the outstanding sum if they cannot do so.

Limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA)

If the funds in your SMSF are inadequate to pay the outright purchase of your commercial real estate, you may use an LRBA to make an application for a loan in order to offset the difference.

An LRBA may be secured through the services of a third-party lender, which may include your own company. You have the ability to borrow money from your own company in the form of an LRBA for your SMSF.

Before making an application, you should carefully examine the LRBA's legal complexities. For example, you could be worried about whether your SMSF will be able to afford loan repayment costs on top of any other expenditures it might currently incur, such member pensions, accounting fees, and auditor fees.

CGT retirement concession

The capital gains tax retirement concession enables business owners to defer paying CGT on business assets with an aggregate value of up to $500,000 over the course of their lifetimes.

In order to qualify for this exemption, you must be at least 55 years old; otherwise, there are no criteria. However, if you are younger than 55 years old, you are required to put the money into a retirement account in order to be eligible for the exemption.

If you are under the age of 55 and want to transfer a piece of commercial real estate into your self-managed super fund (SMSF), you may be able to do so without incurring any capital gains tax obligation (up to a maximum of $500,000).

Should You Put Your Company's Assets Into Your SMSF?

There are a number of compelling arguments that may be made in favour of putting the ownership of your commercial property into the hands of a self-managed 401(k) or other type of retirement account (SMSF). To begin, if your company is operating normally, it will be able to offer the SMSF a consistent stream of rental income and contribute to the capital's growth.

It is possible that this will give you, as a business owner, a degree of stability by eliminating the need for a landlord. Depending on the specifics of a company owner's situation, putting commercial property into a self-managed super fund (SMSF) might be an alluring choice to pursue because of the added benefits associated with doing so.

The subject of taxes is one of the key motivating factors behind making such a move. As a result of the fact that the asset, which is the business premises, will be owned by a superannuation fund, the amount of tax on income and capital gains that the company would be required to pay will, in most cases, be lower than it would have been otherwise.

Earnings from an SMSF, including income from rental property, are subject to a tax rate of 15%. On the other hand, rent or lease expenditures are deductible for the business taxpayer, who is subject to a tax rate of thirty percent (if a corporate).

Because of this, the individuals who are responsible for both the SMSF and the business are eligible to get a 15-cent-per-dollar reduction in the amount of tax that they are required to pay.

The fact that the business is making lease payments to the SMSF can result in two further good outcomes. To begin, these payments represent a monetary contribution to the fund; but because they are considered "investment profits," Oneontribution limitations that the members have for the year.

It is essential to keep in mind that the monthly rental rates ought to be established at ma in order to be in accordance with the legislation regarding the market prices. However, when fund members begin the pension phase, the position has the ability to improve, since a tax on earnings will then be lowered to zero where the asset supports the pension. This means that the situation has the potential to become more favourable. When compared to what came before, this is a significant improvement.

The transaction that results from having the SMSF acquire one's commercial premises will be an economic fillip for the company, and it will either be able to refresh its capital situation or maybe pay down debt, which is the second reason to consider having the SMSF buy one's commercial premises.

A third factor may be stamp duty exemptions or concessions, which varies according to the state where the commercial property is located. For example, when a business property is transferred into a super fund, stamp duty discounts may be available in several states thanks to enacted legislation. However, because the specifics of these concessions are subject to change from state to state, it is recommended that you seek guidance from our office.

The fourth potential advantage is that assets held by superannuation funds may be less accessible to creditors; this advantage, however, may be contingent on the particulars of the circumstance.

It is possible that the fact that assets are held in an SMSF is not an ironclad strategy in the event that creditors could come knocking on the door. This is due to the fact that there are various allowances made within the bankruptcy laws, for example, that can open the door for these transactions to be unwound in certain circumstances. Because of these allowances, it's possible that these transactions can be reversed in certain scenarios.

One of the many stringent requirements that must be met to comply with the legislation is that the property in issue be considered "business real property" and be utilised entirely and exclusively for the business. In addition, even if the laws allow purchase from a connected party, the transaction must be conducted at a reasonable price in the market. As a result, there is a requirement for an impartial evaluation to be conducted and documented.

The acquisition of the asset must be done with the "sole purpose" of contributing to the retirement savings of the members of the SMSF, and the purchase of the property must be in accordance with the investment plan that has been outlined in writing by the SMSF.

Considerable thought must be given to the consequences of the capital gains tax (CGT), which come into play whenever an item pertaining to real estate is sold or otherwise transferred to a new owner. These CGT consequences are the responsibility of the SMSF, who are referred to as the "seller" of the company premises.

The owner of the company may, in many instances, be qualified for the small business capital gains tax discounts, which, depending on the circumstances, can greatly decrease or even eliminate the amount of CGT that is owed on the sale of the property asset. But please enquire with this office for further information.

Another potential benefit that ought to be mentioned at this point is that once the SMSF owns the premises, and over time the members of the fund begin to take a pension, the subsequent sale of the property (which has hopefully increased in value) will not be subject to CGT if the property supports the pension liability. This is an advantage that ought to be mentioned because it has the potential to be quite beneficial. Because it possesses the potential to be of great use to the user, this is a benefit that should be brought to their attention.

And even if the property is sold before any pension is formed, as long as it has been kept for at least a year, the tax on any capital gain is still taxed on a concessional basis in the SMSF at the rate of 10 percent. This is the case even if the property is sold before any pension is formed. This remains the case even in the event that the property is sold prior to the establishment of any pension. Therefore, even if the property has only been maintained for the most shortest possible amount of time, this is still the circumstance.

It is possible to complete the transfer of property into the hands of an SMSF for "nil consideration," which implies that no money is exchanged; rather, the property is transferred as a donation "in-specie" to the fund. This is one of the ways in which the transfer of property can be completed. This indicates that the ownership of the property is changed without any kind of monetary transaction taking place. The transfer might also be completed in a number of other ways, but this is one of them.

However, once that occurs, its value will be regarded as a contribution, and it will therefore be included towards the yearly contribution ceiling restrictions. It is feasible to carry out a transaction that involves both the transfer of cash and a proportionate amount of the underlying asset. It is important to note that capital gains tax can still be levied on in-specie transfers even today.

Assume for the moment that the fund has limited access to monetary resources, despite the fact that it has arrived at the conclusion that purchasing the corporate premises would be in the SMSF's best interest. A limited recourse borrowing agreement could be utilised by the SMSF in this case in order to get a loan for the purpose of purchasing the property.

There can't be any liens or encumbrances on the property, which means any existing mortgages have to be paid off. This is one of the most crucial conditions, and it's also one of the most important needs. Additionally, because the loan has "limited recourse," the lender will not be able to access the other assets held by the SMSF in the event that the borrower defaults on the loan. This safeguard prevents the lender from taking possession of these assets and selling them.

There are a few potential outcomes here, one of which is that the company has the authority to grant this loan. Because anyone can lend money to a super fund, which is one of the features of gearing in a super fund, many owners of small businesses that own commercial property are taking advantage of these provisions to enable their self-managed super funds (SMSF) to borrow money from the business in accordance with a limited recourse borrowing arrangement in order to purchase their commercial property.

If you are thinking of withdrawing money from your SMSF, you should seek the advice of an experienced professional as soon as you can.

In-Specie Transfers To Your SMSF Should Be Considered Again, Especially For Employees

When only the franking credits on a parcel of shares in a super fund yield higher returns than cash, the world has entered an other reality that operates like a time warp.

If you purchase any shares of Westpac, you will be eligible for a dividend yield of 6.54 percent that is fully franked. In addition, the franking credit that comes with it is worth an additional 2.8 percent, and if you're a pension fund, you'll receive all of that amount, bringing the total return up to 9.34 percent.

The current rate of return on franking credits is 2.8 percent, which is a significant amount greater than the highest rate of return that can be obtained on cash investments. The annual percentage yield (APY) on "bonus saving" accounts is just slightly higher than 2 percent.

Which, if it hasn't already, ought to get you thinking about the locations of the places where you keep your assets, if it hasn't already. If you are holding them in your own name right now, you should seriously consider moving them into the self-managed super fund that you have already established.

An in-specie transfer is the term given to the process by which you can move some assets from your personal name into the name of your SMSF.

Due to their lack of popularity in recent years, in-species transfers haven't been used nearly as frequently as they once were as a strategy. In addition, Labor's election promise to get rid of franking credits for the vast majority of SMSFs would have rendered many of the benefits of transferring listed shares into a super fund null and useless. This would have been the case if Labor had won the election.

However, up until around five or six years ago, this strategy was utilised on a large scale with great success. The government at the time made the decision to prohibit in-specie transfers because they were concerned that trustees were exploiting a loophole that enabled them to control the price of assets that were transferred into SMSFs. Because of the concerns expressed, this modification was implemented.

Because the government believed that assets were being transferred into super for far less than they were worth, robbing the tax office of capital gains tax revenue, at the time, it essentially called SMSF trustees out as liars and fraudsters. Again, this is because the government believed that assets were being transferred into super for far less than they were worth.

Both of these things contributed to the fact that the attempt to make the opportunity unlawful was ultimately unsuccessful. The complexity of the law was the primary factor, since it was the first reason. The second factor was that share registrars, such as Computershare and Link, started charging fees to assist with transactions, although in the past, these services had been offered at no cost to customers.

The total number of requests that have been made to carry out in-specie transfers so far. Consequently, dropped precipitously as a direct result of this.

It would appear that the thrill is no longer present. However, on the other side, the benefits have not diminished.

What Are In-Specie Transfers?

The process of transferring assets between owners who are related to one another in some way is referred to as a family business transaction. For the purpose of this demonstration, we will limit the transfer of a personal name to the SMSF since we want everything to be as clear as possible.
You are giving your self-managed super fund (SMSF) ownership of certain assets, such as five hundred BHP shares, so transferring that ownership from yourself.

It is only possible for a restricted amount of assets. Listed shares, widely held managed funds, commercial or industrial property, or cash-based assets such as bonds and debentures are examples of acceptable investments.

Residential real estate cannot be sold or transferred. There is a blanket prohibition on SMSFs buying or accepting residential property from members or affiliates of the fund, and this includes members of the member's immediate family. Just don't do it.

Why would you do it?

Once an asset is transferred into a superannuation account, it is subject to the tax rates that are applicable to superannuation accounts rather than the personal tax rates. This is the fundamental reason why this is the case.

If you are subject to the maximum marginal tax rate of 47 percent, you will be responsible for a significant amount of additional income tax on any dividends you get. If, on the other hand, the identical asset is held in a superannuation account, the highest tax rate you will pay is fifteen percent; however, there will be no tax charged if the asset is backing a pension fund.

If you sell an asset that is registered in your name and make a profit, you may be subject to a tax on capital gains of up to 23.5 percent of the profit. This tax may be subject to change in the future. If, on the other hand, the asset is held in a super fund, you will be subject to a capital gains tax of up to ten percent when you sell it during the accumulation part of the phase, but you won't be subject to any capital gains tax when you sell it during the pension phase of the phase.

Imagine an asset that you plan to keep for the next ten or twenty years until retirement, during which time it will accrue low-tax returns on income streams and that you will be able to sell after retirement without being subject to any taxation on the gain.

This is the primary advantage of moving assets in-kind into a superannuation account rather than selling them.

It Does Create a CGT Event

A capital gains tax (CGT) event occurs at the time that the asset is transferred from your name to the SMSF. Therefore, when deciding whether or not it is worthwhile, you also need to consider the amount of tax you will be required to pay.

Various strategies may be taken into account in this situation (the full details will have to wait for another day).

You might be able to balance the entire situation if you have significant gains on some shares (like BHP and Macquarie) and losses on others (like Telstra) by moving some gains and losses from one share parcel to another.

If you have shares of stock that are currently yielding little profit or loss but you anticipate significant returns in the future, it's likely that now is the optimum time to transfer those shares.

Transfers Are Contributions

The value of the transfer itself is considered a contribution; specifically, it can be categorised as a concessional contribution (CC) or a non-concessional contribution (NCC).

As a result, you will have to factor it into the plans you have made to accommodate those limits.

If you are not currently making use of your maximum credit card limit of $25,000, then the in-kind transfer could be utilised in its entirety or in part for the purpose that was described above. (An additional advantage of this situation is that if you do have a CGT event outside of super on the "sale" of the assets, the in-specie payment might be a tax credit, and there is also the prospect of a concessional contribution, which could assist in lowering that.)

In that instance, your company has made payments to you totalling $15,000 regarding your super guarantee (SG), leaving you with a credit card limit of only $10,000. As a result, you have the ability to make an in-specie transfer into your SMSF of shares worth $10,000.

If you so wished, you could make more than that specified number of transfers. This option is available to you. For instance, you might label the first ten thousand dollars as CCs and the remaining money as NCCs. You could even designate the entire amount as NCCs.

One of the key reasons why this strategy needs to restore some of its former relevance is due to the tremendous improvement that has been done in this area for workers over the past few years in terms of their contributions.

Because the 10 percent limit is no longer in effect, it is now possible for all workers to use in-kind transfers to make concessional contributions. This was not previously the case.

Before the start of July in 2017, if you earned more than 10 percent of your income as an employee, you were ineligible to make personal contributions that were tax deductible. Because of this, in-kind transfers such as CCs were not an option for employees who earned more than the specified percentage of their total income from their employment.

Make that payment in lieu of cash for ten thousand dollars' worth of BHP shares. In most cases, you will be able to claim a tax deduction for the expense (if you qualify to make personal deductible contributions). In this context, additional regulations govern the deductibility of personal donations. Please refer to this column (22/11/17) for further information.

You can use the "pull-forward" provisions, which let you contribute up to $300,000 to spend your limit in the current year plus the next two financial years, if you desire to use in-specie transfers to make NCCs. These limits are set at $100,000 per year. Additionally, there are limitations of up to $100,000 per year if you want to employ in-specie transfers to create NCCs. In order to prevent system abuse, you will also be limited to $100,000 each year if you want to use in-specie transfers to build NCCs.

Costs and buy/sell spread risk

There is typically some sort of fee associated with the situation. In order to finalise the transfer, the majority of the primary shareholder registries, such as Computershare and Link, will charge a fee that falls somewhere between $50 and $60. Because of this, the purchase of smaller chunks of shares might not seem like as appealing of an option.

Some people might wonder why they shouldn't just sell the asset, put the money in their retirement account, and then buy the item all over again.

You can. However, during that time, you would be unable to engage in any kind of trading, which would force you to stay away from the market for at least a week.

It would be fantastic news if, during the course of that time period, the value of the shares decreased. On the other hand, if they move up, then the $55 that was spent on the transfer fee would have been a very good investment. This would have been the case if the transfer was successful.

Business Real Property

An enormous subject all on its own, which we'll get to another time. When certain conditions are met, the transfer of commercial property to an SMSF can make incredible financial sense.

Because the 10 percent condition that required their utilisation has been removed, in-specie transfers should start to get more interest as a strategy once again. This is especially true in view of the fact that their utilisation was previously compulsory.

And with recent growth slowdowns, particularly on the Australian stock market, this might be the ideal moment to familiarise yourself with the market.

DISCLAIMER:

The information contained in this publication is primarily of a general nature and does not provide readers with individualised recommendations regarding their finances or investments. It does not take into account the particular objectives you have or the circumstances in which you find yourself.

No one should take any action based on this content before first seeking out the counsel of a professionally competent property adviser who is adequately qualified, and then sticking to that counsel.

No person who was involved in producing, distributing, or providing the information that is contained in this publication (including Taxpayers Australia Incorporated and each of its directors, councillors, employees, and contractors, as well as the editors or authors of the information) will be held liable in any way, shape, or form for any loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of using this information or having access to it, to the fullest extent permissible by law. This includes Taxpayers Australia Incorporated and This pertains to each and every one of the individuals who made a contribution. Everyone who contributed to the information in any capacity, be it as an editor or an author, is included here.